I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet during the 160 course that my older rifle likes.
Naturally, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different great deal figures, but I do think I understand why. It's a litigation-pushed environment, and a few fool would surely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his have customized combination of powder. What a environment.
Liberalism; The unachievable but recognized notion that it is solely probable to pick up a turd because of the clean conclusion.
Yes you could. These are the same specific powder even so the SC powder is just Slice shorter so it meters far better.
IMR powders also preform very well for me with one particular notable exception. All the chrongraphing I've performed with them implies the velecity is consistant higher than 32 degrees but starts to range after the temp starts to fall. The closer to zero I get the greater they change. I have noticed as much as 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 inside the winter time all over listed here. Haven't noticed this with a lot of the other powders.
Because there isn't going to seem like any "official" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a few of you supply a starting point with this combination and issues to think about when Operating this Load up?
Anyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the final results, any data you are able to share? Must also point out I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I wish to test out, Should you have data on that as well.
The SC or SSC designated powders Generally make it possible for for higher load density, so you're able to ordinarily get a little far more powder in a very given situation when employing compressed loads. Usage of a fall tube can further more improve this benefit.
I have observed the precise reverse to become correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
[e-mail secured] gn and 115 h4831sc load data CT's, I have killed additional Deer with this combo than the many rifles I own blended, Work around this nevertheless the sweet place will be close to fifty four, I am a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat operates very well for me In the event your interested
If there's no load data it can be because this powder just isn't h4831sc appropriate for this cartridge. Commonly a person won't locate one particular powder to fit all cartridges, along with the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you will be inquiring about won't get the job done. Simply click to develop...
It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot group currently. It really is a little slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Thanks for the recommendation, It really is good to are aware that I've acquired options when just one or the other powder is dried up.
Both of those possess the Similar burn charge, small Reduce comes in useful if you are at max fill and never at force/velocity that you want you may get additional shortcut in a situation.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. Following months, I obtained lucky and caught some H1000 on line and naturally compensated just a little extra. The quite next week in a gun clearly show a guy had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $40 for each 1lb. I forget about exactly how much, but With all the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and h4831sc it’s a delicate load.